aspb_navtop.gif (313 bytes)
About The ASPB
ASPB Programs
Publications
Research Results
Arkansas Ag Statistics
Internet Resources

Publications Arkansas Soybean Promotion Board


Arkansas Soybean Promotion Board


Soybeans Today January 1999

Effect Of Lime On Soybean-Rice Rotation Examined

By Rich Maples

Nathan Slaton looks at a root nodulation

A farmer who rotates rice and soybeans asks, "If I lime my soil for soybeans, will it hurt next year's rice crop?"

Not necessarily, according to Nathan Slaton, an agronomist for the Cooperative Extension Service, University of Arkansas. Slaton is studying the effect of lime on soybeans and rice in rotation at the U of A Rice Research and Extension Center, Stuttgart. The project is financed by grower checkoff funds through the Arkansas Soybean Promotion Board.

Slaton notes that soybeans like a neutral pH, which can cause nutritional problems for rice. The Stuttgart study site has a low soil pH, and both the soybeans and rice are watered with high quality reservoir water. "When farmers pump groundwater, they may be pumping calcium bicarbonate, which becomes lime.

"The low pH here at the Rice Research and Extension Center contributed to low yields in the university soybean performance trials during the early '90s."

Slaton says there are farmers across the state with the same problem -- soil with a pH level too low for optimum soybean production -- but when they're growing beans and rice in a one-to-one rotation, they fear that applying lime will reduce their rice yields, not to mention their income.

"In years like 1998, when you compare the price you get for rice and soybeans, and then look at what you can make yield-wise, generally the rice is going to be more profitable," says Slaton.

But is lime always bad for rice? Not according to the study, says Slaton.

"In the fall of 1995, we applied four rates of lime -- zero, 1 ton, 2 tons and 4 tons per acre -- on soil with a very low pH of 4.9 to 5.0. With each rate, we applied two rates of phosphorus and zinc. We were interested in phosphorus and zinc because their availability is influenced by soil pH."

Rice and soybeans were planted in alternating strips, with four replications of each lime rate across the plots. Two soybean varieties, Holladay and Delsoy 5500, and four rice varieties were used in the study.

"In 1996, averaging the two soybean varieties together, we saw a yield of 39 bushels per acre where no lime was applied," says Slaton. "The average yield was 44 bushels per acre where 1 ton of lime was applied, 48 bushels where 2 tons were used and 48 bushels where 4 tons of lime were applied.

"So we saw a 9-bushel increase where 2 tons or more lime was applied."

He adds, "There was also a trend toward higher rice yields when lime was applied."

In the 1996 study, the rice yield was 107 bushels per acre where no lime was applied, 120 bushels where 1 ton of lime was applied, 118 bushels where 2 tons were used and 116 bushels per acre where 4 tons of lime were applied.

"That's not at all what we expected," says Slaton. "We expected the 4-ton rate of lime to hammer the rice."

In 1997, the average soybean yield was 55 bushels per acre where no lime was used, 57 bushels where 1 ton was applied, 59 bushels where 2 tons were used and 60 bushels per acre where 4 tons of lime were applied.

Rice yields in the second year of the study were 148 bushels per acre where no lime was applied, 150 bushels with the 1-ton rate, 146 bushels where 2 tons of lime were used and 154 bushels per acre where 4 tons were applied.

"While the trend toward higher soybean yields continued, statistically there wasn't a significant difference in rice yields in the second year," says Slaton. "The overall increase in yields from the first to the second year was because of management practices. The field was planted late in 1996."

In 1997, a year after lime was applied, the soil with an original pH of 4.9 to 5.0 had a pH of 5.1 where no lime was applied, 5.5 where 1 ton was used, 6.5 where 2 tons were used, and 7.1 where 4 tons of lime were applied.

"The fact that the soil pH was only 7.1 where 4 tons of lime were applied helps explain why that rate of lime didn't hurt rice yields," says Slaton. "Where we see problems in growers' rice fields is when the soil pH is 7.5 to 8."

Slaton says that while rice yields didn't decline in the lime study, phosphorus and zinc levels in rice tissue did decrease as the lime rate and pH increased. "Overliming, getting the pH too high, can cause phosphorus and zinc deficiencies in rice.

"When we looked at soybean tissue, we found that as pH increased, the phosphorus concentration increased and the zinc concentration decreased. Some soybeans varieties may be more susceptible to zinc deficiency than others."

Soybeans Today January 1999
Table of Contents

 

About the ASPB | ASPB Programs | Publications
Research Results | Arkansas Ag Statistics | Internet Resources
Biodiesel Suppliers | Homepage

For additional information about any board-related activity contact:

Arkansas Soybean Promotion Board
ATTN: Brandy Carroll
P.O. Box 31
Little Rock, AR 72203-0031
Phone: 501-228-1268

Copyright © 2008 Arkansas Soybean Promotion Board.
All rights reserved.

Web Services by Aristotle Web Design.
Privacy Policy